Workplace Law & Advocacy
Home
|
News
|
Wal-Mart Bargaining ...

Wal-Mart Bargaining Unit Not Appropriate

July 24, 2006
Share

The BC Labour Relations Board has rejected a proposed bargaining unit in a Wal-Mart store because it cut across classification lines.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Union applied for certification of a bargaining unit consisting of only the automotive workers at the Wal-Mart store in Cranbrook. Although it cut across classification lines – because it excluded employees with similar positions outside the automotive department – the Board initially found the unit to be appropriate. Wal-Mart applied for reconsideration of this decision, arguing that the original panel’s decision was inconsistent with the principles established by the Board in Island Medical Laboratories for determining the appropriateness of a bargaining unit.

A Reconsideration Panel of the Board agreed with Wal-Mart, confirming the IML principle that bargaining units should not cut across classification lines. The Board concluded that the automotive workers were not sufficiently distinct from other employees in the store to justify certifying a bargaining unit that included only the automotive workers, and accordingly rejected the Union’s proposed bargaining unit.

Wal-Mart Canada Corp. -and- United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 1518, BCLRB No. 153/2006 [Leave for Reconsideration of BCLRB No. B5/2006]
(Click herefor copy of Decision)

Share

Related News

Harris & Company LLP
14th Floor, Bentall 5
550 Burrard Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 2B5
Canada
Subscribe to receive our updates on the latest legal developments and best practices in workplace law and advocacy now.
© 2025 Harris & Company LLP. All rights reserved.